I have always really liked the way this scene flows. A lot of
the camera movement is fluid. They don’t cut to different frames, the camera
moves around the scene. In the beginning when the car is pulling into the
parking lot of the pool hall it follows the car that Randal, Mitch, and David
are in. When it cuts to the next scene the director used the 30 rule. He
used this by being 30% or more closer to the actors when David flings open the
door. As the actors begin to walk in the camera slowly zooms out slightly and
then goes backward in front of the characters as they make their way through
the hall. It then cuts to another frame of an establishing shot of the room
showing people hanging out and playing pool and foosball. It uses the rule of
30 again here by rotating the camera 30 degrees. Then the scene cuts to inside
of the foosball table while people are playing. This again uses the 30 rule by
being more than 30% closer than the last
frame. This one is really close up to the ball and the actions because it is
literally inside the table. In the last frame the rule of 30 is used again when
it zooms back out to show the people surrounding the table that was just zoomed
in on. I could not really find an example of the 180 degree rule in this clip.
I think this is because there was no direct dialog between two characters that
was shown close up. The rule of thirds is used in just about every frame. Most
of the important objects and characters line up with the lines when the frame
is divided by the rule of thirds. I don’t think that the rules were really
broken in this scene. The only one I couldn’t find was the 180 degree rule, and
as I said there was no dialog that was applicable to this rule. Other than that
the director followed the rules. I really like this scene and the way it was
directed. I particularly enjoy the way the characters move in relation to the
camera and the music.
No comments:
Post a Comment